Lauren wrote:I think it's awesome that our customers would go to such lengths to compare performance of different litters in our Litter-Robot. Only our wonderful customers would be willing to go to such trouble. I can't imagine how this information could not be helpful to others. I am definitely interested to see the outcome.
I do not think it's "awesome". I think the manufacturer should have done that research, and suggest few exact brands that work - really work. It's OK to mention that other brands and types work, too - but we shouldn't go through all that exercise - I am trying third brand/type in just four days since I got my LR.
It is clear; this unit is badly, badly under-developed. It is "half-baked".
It is also clear, that this principle is working, and LR2, or LR Super, or LR Plus - or whatever name they come up with - will be way, way better, and most probably excellent. There are many very little things that are obviously should be tried:
- increasing size of the waste drawer;
- making possible to put bag conveniently;
- making inside of the globe non-sticky;
- altering waste openings' profile so it wouldn't make a cliff for the waste to hung on;
- making entrance to be short-tube-like (less litter dropping out during rotation);
- who said that opening must be in a center of the globe? Move it up an inch, and amount of litter can be increased (yes, it will be lower an inch while rotating - but that's not important, right?)
- etc., etc., etc...
Well, maybe it just tired and a bit frustrating engineer came home from work and talking nonsense... But litter - litter MUST be tested and clearly suggested. After all, we paid you quite a bit and can expect you being experts on this potentially great product...
